You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prevalence and Burden of Gait Disorders in Elderly Men and Women Aged 60–97 Years: A Population-Based Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0069627 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philipp Mahlknecht, Stefan Kiechl, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Johann Willeit, Christoph Scherfler, Arno Gasperi, Gregorio Rungger, Werner Poewe, Klaus Seppi |
Abstract |
Although gait disorders are common in the elderly, the prevalence and overall burden of these disorders in the general community is not well defined. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 304 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
Researcher | 29 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
Other | 43 | 14% |
Unknown | 98 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 17% |
Engineering | 37 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 19 | 6% |
Psychology | 15 | 5% |
Other | 41 | 13% |
Unknown | 119 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,933,785
of 24,842,061 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,247
of 215,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,194
of 203,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#879
of 4,816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,842,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.