↓ Skip to main content

Adult Stature and Risk of Cancer at Different Anatomic Sites in a Cohort of Postmenopausal Women

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 4,053)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
93 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adult Stature and Risk of Cancer at Different Anatomic Sites in a Cohort of Postmenopausal Women
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, July 2013
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey C. Kabat, Matthew L. Anderson, Moonseong Heo, H. Dean Hosgood, Victor Kamensky, Jennifer W. Bea, Lifang Hou, Dorothy S. Lane, Jean Wactawski-Wende, JoAnn E. Manson, Thomas E. Rohan

Abstract

Prospective studies in Western and Asian populations suggest that height is a risk factor for various cancers. However, few studies have explored potential confounding or effect modification of the association by other factors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Other 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Engineering 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 384. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2021.
All research outputs
#47,821
of 18,846,561 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#27
of 4,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329
of 170,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,846,561 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.