↓ Skip to main content

Blaming a Few Bad Apples to Save a Threatened Barrel: The System‐Justifying Function of Conspiracy Theories

Overview of attention for article published in Political Psychology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
82 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blaming a Few Bad Apples to Save a Threatened Barrel: The System‐Justifying Function of Conspiracy Theories
Published in
Political Psychology, February 2017
DOI 10.1111/pops.12404
Authors

Daniel Jolley, Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 38%
Social Sciences 33 19%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Linguistics 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 45 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#452,689
of 25,886,866 outputs
Outputs from Political Psychology
#61
of 1,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,412
of 325,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Psychology
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,886,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.