You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
No personalization without participation: on the active contribution of psychiatric patients to the development of a mobile application for mental health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-François Pelletier, Michael Rowe, Nathe François, Julie Bordeleau, Sonia Lupien |
| Abstract |
Despite the increasing pervasiveness of mobile computational technologies, knowledge about psychiatric patients' preferences regarding the design and utility of mobile applications is very poor. This paper reports on a pilot-study that involved 120 psychiatric patients in the development of a mobile application (app) that is being used for data entry into the Signature Project data bank at the Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (IUSMM), Canada. Participants were invited to comment on the 'look and feel' of the Signature App. Their input also extended the procedures for data collection. These suggestions may contribute to increased mental health literacy and empowerment of persons with mental illness receiving services at the IUSMM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 20% |
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2013.
All research outputs
#3,778,420
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#300
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,762
of 201,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.