↓ Skip to main content

Guías bilingües: una estrategia para disminuir las barreras culturales en el acceso y la atención en salud de las comunidades wayuu de Maicao, Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Salud colectiva, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guías bilingües: una estrategia para disminuir las barreras culturales en el acceso y la atención en salud de las comunidades wayuu de Maicao, Colombia
Published in
Salud colectiva, October 2016
DOI 10.18294/sc.2016.883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Yaneth Patiño-Londoño, Javier Mignone, Diana María Castro-Arroyave, Natalia Gómez Valencia, Carlos Alberto Rojas Arbeláez

Abstract

The article examines the use of bilingual guides to decrease cultural barriers to health care access in the Wayuu indigenous communities of Colombia. Within a larger project on HIV carried out between 2012 and 2014, 24 interviews were conducted with key actors in the administrative and health areas, including Wayuu bilingual guides. As a result of the qualitative analysis, the study identified three cultural barriers to health care access: a) language; b) the Wayuu worldview regarding the body, health, and illness; and c) information about sexual and reproductive health and HIV not adapted to the Wayuu culture. The study identifies the bilingual guides as key actors in reducing these barriers and concludes with a discussion of the role of the guides, the tensions inherent to their work, and the complexity of their contributions as cultural mediators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#16,280,493
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Salud colectiva
#127
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,545
of 328,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Salud colectiva
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.