Title |
Two Genetically Similar H9N2 Influenza A Viruses Show Different Pathogenicity in Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01737 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qingtao Liu, Yuzhuo Liu, Jing Yang, Xinmei Huang, Kaikai Han, Dongmin Zhao, Keran Bi, Yin Li |
Abstract |
H9N2 Avian influenza virus has repeatedly infected humans and other mammals, which highlights the need to determine the pathogenicity and the corresponding mechanism of this virus for mammals. In this study, we found two H9N2 viruses with similar genetic background but with different pathogenicity in mice. The A/duck/Nanjing/06/2003 (NJ06) virus was highly pathogenic for mice, with a 50% mouse lethal dose (MLD50) of 10(2.83) 50% egg infectious dose (EID50), whereas the A/duck/Nanjing/01/1999 (NJ01) virus was low pathogenic for mice, with a MLD50 of >10(6.81) EID50. Further studies showed that the NJ06 virus grew faster and reached significantly higher titers than NJ01 in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, the NJ06 virus induced more severe lung lesions, and higher levels of inflammatory cellular infiltration and cytokine response in lungs than NJ01 did. However, only 12 different amino acid residues (HA-K157E, NA-A9T, NA-R435K, PB2-T149P, PB2-K627E, PB1-R187K, PA-L548M, PA-M550L, NP-G127E, NP-P277H, NP-D340N, NS1-D171N) were found between the two viruses, and all these residues except for NA-R435K were located in the known functional regions involved in interaction of viral proteins or between the virus and host factors. Summary, our results suggest that multiple amino acid differences may be responsible for the higher pathogenicity of the NJ06 virus for mice, resulting in lethal infection, enhanced viral replication, severe lung lesions, and excessive inflammatory cellular infiltration and cytokine response in lungs. These observations will be helpful for better understanding the pathogenic potential and the corresponding molecular basis of H9N2 viruses that might pose threats to human health in the future. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 20% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 13% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |