↓ Skip to main content

Tsunami watch

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tsunami watch
Published in
Nature, December 2009
DOI 10.1038/462968a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quirin Schiermeier, Alexandra Witze

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 20%
India 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 40%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,581
of 91,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,776
of 165,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#399
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.