↓ Skip to main content

Antifibrinolytics (lysine analogues) for the prevention of bleeding in patients with haematological disorders.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antifibrinolytics (lysine analogues) for the prevention of bleeding in patients with haematological disorders.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009733.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas Wardrop, Lise J Estcourt, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Marialena Trivella, Simon Stanworth, Michael F Murphy, Lise J Estcourt

Abstract

Patients with haematological disorders are frequently at risk of severe or life-threatening bleeding as a result of thrombocytopenia. This is despite the routine use of prophylactic platelet transfusions (PlTx) to prevent bleeding once the platelet count falls below a certain threshold. PlTx are not without risk and adverse events may be life-threatening. A possible adjunct to prophylactic PlTxs is the use of antifibrinolytics, specifically the lysine analogues tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 15%
Other 6 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 61%
Unspecified 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Psychology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#5,293,589
of 6,228,985 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,879
of 7,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,040
of 100,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,228,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.