↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Laboratory Toxicity after Intra-Arterial Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres for Unresectable Liver Metastases

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and Laboratory Toxicity after Intra-Arterial Radioembolization with 90Y-Microspheres for Unresectable Liver Metastases
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069448
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maarten L. J. Smits, Andor F. van den Hoven, Charlotte E. N. M. Rosenbaum, Bernard A. Zonnenberg, Marnix G. E. H. Lam, Johannes F. W. Nijsen, Miriam Koopman, Maurice A. A. J. van den Bosch

Abstract

To investigate clinical and laboratory toxicity in patients with unresectable liver metastases, treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization ((90)Y-RE).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Other 6 11%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 53%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,342,133
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,156
of 193,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,338
of 197,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,642
of 4,796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.