↓ Skip to main content

LifeMap Discovery™: The Embryonic Development, Stem Cells, and Regenerative Medicine Research Portal

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LifeMap Discovery™: The Embryonic Development, Stem Cells, and Regenerative Medicine Research Portal
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ron Edgar, Yaron Mazor, Ariel Rinon, Jacob Blumenthal, Yaron Golan, Ella Buzhor, Idit Livnat, Shani Ben-Ari, Iris Lieder, Alina Shitrit, Yaron Gilboa, Ahmi Ben-Yehudah, Osnat Edri, Netta Shraga, Yoel Bogoch, Lucy Leshansky, Shlomi Aharoni, Michael D. West, David Warshawsky, Ronit Shtrichman

Abstract

LifeMap Discovery™ provides investigators with an integrated database of embryonic development, stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. The hand-curated reconstruction of cell ontology with stem cell biology; including molecular, cellular, anatomical and disease-related information, provides efficient and easy-to-use, searchable research tools. The database collates in vivo and in vitro gene expression and guides translation from in vitro data to the clinical utility, and thus can be utilized as a powerful tool for research and discovery in stem cell biology, developmental biology, disease mechanisms and therapeutic discovery. LifeMap Discovery is freely available to academic nonprofit institutions at http://discovery.lifemapsc.com.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 114 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,536,592
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,933
of 193,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,263
of 172,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#814
of 4,687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.