You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modulations of the executive control network by stimulus onset asynchrony in a Stroop task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-14-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily L Coderre, Walter J B van Heuven |
| Abstract |
Manipulating task difficulty is a useful way of elucidating the functional recruitment of the brain's executive control network. In a Stroop task, pre-exposing the irrelevant word using varying stimulus onset asynchronies ('negative' SOAs) modulates the amount of behavioural interference and facilitation, suggesting disparate mechanisms of cognitive processing in each SOA. The current study employed a Stroop task with three SOAs (-400, -200, 0 ms), using functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate for the first time the neural effects of SOA manipulation. Of specific interest were 1) how SOA affects the neural representation of interference and facilitation; 2) response priming effects in negative SOAs; and 3) attentional effects of blocked SOA presentation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 43% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#21,309,688
of 23,936,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#1,078
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,738
of 201,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#48
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,936,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.