↓ Skip to main content

This Examined Life: The Upside of Self-Knowledge for Interpersonal Relationships

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
This Examined Life: The Upside of Self-Knowledge for Interpersonal Relationships
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth R. Tenney, Simine Vazire, Matthias R. Mehl

Abstract

Although self-knowledge is an unquestioned good in many philosophical traditions, testing this assumption scientifically has posed a challenge because of the difficulty of measuring individual differences in self-knowledge. In this study, we used a novel, naturalistic, and objective criterion to determine individuals' degree of self-knowledge. Specifically, self-knowledge was measured as the congruence between people's beliefs about how they typically behave and their actual behavior as measured with unobtrusive audio recordings from daily life. We found that this measure of self-knowledge was positively correlated with informants' perceptions of relationship quality. These results suggest that self-knowledge is interpersonally advantageous. Given the importance of relationships for our social species, self-knowledge could have great social value that has heretofore been overlooked.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 57%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#870,464
of 24,900,093 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,536
of 215,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,057
of 204,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#320
of 4,889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,900,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.