↓ Skip to main content

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009955.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Cavalheri, Fatim Tahirah, Mika L Nonoyama, Sue Jenkins, Kylie Hill

Abstract

Decreased exercise capacity and impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are common in people following lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Exercise training has been demonstrated to confer gains in exercise capacity and HRQoL for people with a range of chronic conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, as well as in people with cancers such as prostate and breast cancer. A programme of exercise training for people following lung resection for NSCLC may confer important gains in these outcomes. To date, evidence of its efficacy in this population is unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 1%
Unknown 162 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,171,825
of 12,705,184 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,045
of 10,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,417
of 153,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,705,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.