↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1841 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict
Published in
Science, August 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1235367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Solomon M. Hsiang, Marshall Burke, Edward Miguel

Abstract

A rapidly growing body of research examines whether human conflict can be affected by climatic changes. Drawing from archaeology, criminology, economics, geography, history, political science, and psychology, we assemble and analyze the 60 most rigorous quantitative studies and document, for the first time, a striking convergence of results. We find strong causal evidence linking climatic events to human conflict across a range of spatial and temporal scales and across all major regions of the world. The magnitude of climate's influence is substantial: for each one standard deviation (1σ) change in climate toward warmer temperatures or more extreme rainfall, median estimates indicate that the frequency of interpersonal violence rises 4% and the frequency of intergroup conflict rises 14%. Because locations throughout the inhabited world are expected to warm 2σ to 4σ by 2050, amplified rates of human conflict could represent a large and critical impact of anthropogenic climate change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 687 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,841 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 34 2%
Germany 11 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
France 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 22 1%
Unknown 1750 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 424 23%
Researcher 304 17%
Student > Master 240 13%
Student > Bachelor 162 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 89 5%
Other 285 15%
Unknown 337 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 265 14%
Social Sciences 260 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 243 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 140 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 139 8%
Other 368 20%
Unknown 426 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,970
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Science
#211
of 83,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 211,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#2
of 839 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 839 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.