You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance of Multiplex Commercial Kits to Quantify Cytokine and Chemokine Responses in Culture Supernatants from Plasmodium falciparum Stimulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0052587 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gemma Moncunill, John J. Aponte, Augusto J. Nhabomba, Carlota Dobaño |
| Abstract |
Cytokines and chemokines are relevant biomarkers of pathology and immunity to infectious diseases such as malaria. Several commercially available kits based on quantitative suspension array technologies allow the profiling of multiple cytokines and chemokines in small volumes of sample. However, kits are being continuously improved and information on their performance is lacking. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#4,155,790
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#58,882
of 193,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,314
of 280,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,050
of 4,768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.