↓ Skip to main content

Psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and adolescents who have been sexually abused

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and adolescents who have been sexually abused
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008162.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Parker, William Turner

Abstract

The sexual abuse of children and adolescents is a significant worldwide problem. It is associated with a wide variety of negative psychological, social and physical consequences for the victims. These effects can often be seen immediately following sexual abuse, but they may manifest later on and sometimes only in adult life. There are a number of different interventions aimed at helping children and adolescents who have been sexually abused, and psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy has a long-established tradition of being used for such victims. In this review, we set out to find the evidence for its effectiveness specifically in children and adolescents who have been sexually abused.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 26%
Researcher 21 14%
Unspecified 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Unspecified 25 17%
Social Sciences 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Other 8 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#730,229
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,283
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,599
of 152,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.