↓ Skip to main content

Tropospheric degradation products of CH2FCF3 (HFC-134a)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tropospheric degradation products of CH2FCF3 (HFC-134a)
Published in
Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, May 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf01032627
Authors

Ernesto C. Tuazon, Roger Atkinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 60%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 20%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
#65
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,941
of 20,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them