↓ Skip to main content

Preventing Youth from Falling Through the Cracks Between Child/Adolescent and Adult Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review of Models of Care

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventing Youth from Falling Through the Cracks Between Child/Adolescent and Adult Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review of Models of Care
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10597-017-0098-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tram Nguyen, Mark G. Embrett, Neil G. Barr, Gillian M. Mulvale, Diana K. Vania, Glen E. Randall, Briano DiRezze

Abstract

Optimizing the transition between child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) and adult mental health services (AMHS) is a priority for healthcare systems. The purpose of this systematic review is to: (1) identify and compare models of care that may be used to facilitate the transition from CAMHS to AMHS; and (2) discuss trends and implications to inform future research and practice. Results identified three models of care which move beyond healthcare services and incorporate a broader range of services that better meet the dynamic needs of transition-aged youth. Joint working among providers, coupled with individualized approaches, is essential to facilitating continuity of care.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 118 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 35 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Psychology 14 12%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 37 31%