You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Promoting universal financial protection: how the Thai universal coverage scheme was designed to ensure equity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-11-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Viroj Tangcharoensathien, Siriwan Pitayarangsarit, Walaiporn Patcharanarumol, Phusit Prakongsai, Hathaichanok Sumalee, Jiraboon Tosanguan, Anne Mills |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
Thailand | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Egypt | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 200 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 53 | 26% |
Researcher | 25 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 17% |
Unknown | 46 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 27 | 13% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 16 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 10% |
Unknown | 58 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,775,502
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#203
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,892
of 208,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.