You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Childhood Intussusception: A Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0068482 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Jiang, Baoming Jiang, Umesh Parashar, Trang Nguyen, Julie Bines, Manish M. Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 83 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,698,382
of 23,755,107 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,388
of 202,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,508
of 199,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,415
of 4,765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,755,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.