↓ Skip to main content

In-work tax credits for families and their impact on health status in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-work tax credits for families and their impact on health status in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009963.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Pega, Kristie Carter, Tony Blakely, Patricia J Lucas

Abstract

By improving two social determinants of health (poverty and unemployment) in low- and middle-income families on or at risk of welfare, in-work tax credit for families (IWTC) interventions could impact health status and outcomes in adults.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 204 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 24%
Researcher 37 18%
Unspecified 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 37%
Unspecified 40 19%
Social Sciences 27 13%
Psychology 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Other 24 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,639,790
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,171
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,139
of 152,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.