↓ Skip to main content

A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents

Overview of attention for article published in Psychometrika, September 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A scaling model with response errors and intrinsically unscalable respondents
Published in
Psychometrika, September 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf02293908
Authors

C. Mitchell Dayton, George B. Macready

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 60%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 60%
Psychology 1 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 1989.
All research outputs
#7,522,368
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Psychometrika
#141
of 504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,768
of 6,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychometrika
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 504 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.