You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Designing a curriculum for communication skills training from a theory and evidence-based perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient Education & Counseling, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.012 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard L. Street, Hanneke C.J.M. De Haes |
Abstract |
Because quality health care delivery requires effective clinician-patient communication, successful training of health professionals requires communication skill curricula of the highest quality. Two approaches for developing medical communication curricula are a consensus approach and a theory driven approach. We propose a theory-driven, communication function framework for identifying important communication skills, one that is focused on the key goals and outcomes that need to be accomplished in clinical encounters. We discuss 7 communication functions important to medical encounters and the types of skills needed to accomplish each. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 156 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
Lecturer | 14 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Other | 47 | 29% |
Unknown | 23 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 34% |
Social Sciences | 26 | 16% |
Psychology | 15 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 17% |
Unknown | 28 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2013.
All research outputs
#19,918,349
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#3,309
of 4,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,168
of 209,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#42
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.