↓ Skip to main content

Neuroimaging predictors of treatment response in anxiety disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroimaging predictors of treatment response in anxiety disorders
Published in
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-5380-3-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M Shin, F Caroline Davis, Michael B VanElzakker, Mary K Dahlgren, Stacey J Dubois

Abstract

Although several psychological and pharmacological treatment options are available for anxiety disorders, not all patients respond well to each option. Furthermore, given the relatively long duration of adequate treatment trials, finding a good treatment fit can take many months or longer. Thus, both clinicians and patients would benefit from the identification of objective pre-treatment measures that predict which patients will best respond to a given treatment. Recent studies have begun to use biological measures to help predict symptomatic change after treatment in anxiety disorders. In this review, we summarize studies that have used structural and functional neuroimaging measures to predict treatment response in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD). We note the limitations of the current studies and offer suggestions for future research. Although the literature is currently small, we conclude that pre-treatment neuroimaging measures do appear to predict treatment response in anxiety disorders, and future research will be needed to determine the relative predictive power of neuroimaging measures as compared to clinical and demographic measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Researcher 27 21%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Neuroscience 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,876,021
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#34
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,106
of 209,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.