You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Let’s Dance Together: Synchrony, Shared Intentionality and Cooperation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0071182 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Reddish, Ronald Fischer, Joseph Bulbulia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 414 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 15% |
| Researcher | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 184 | 43% |
| Arts and Humanities | 33 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 13% |
| Unknown | 86 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#734,508
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,779
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,717
of 211,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#247
of 4,875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.