↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic dilemmas of squamous differentiation in prostate carcinoma case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic dilemmas of squamous differentiation in prostate carcinoma case report and review of the literature
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-6-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicoleta C Arva, Kasturi Das

Abstract

We report a case of pure squamous cell carcinoma involving the prostate and urinary bladder and describe the diagnostic dilemmas that we faced in trying to determine its origin. The patient was diagnosed ten years ago with prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with radioactive seed implantation. During the last year he also underwent a TURP procedure for urinary obstruction complicated by multiple infections. Postsurgery, the patient developed colo-urethral fistula and decision to perform cystoprostatectomy was taken. Excision illustrated a tumor mass replacing the entire prostate that microscopically proved to be squamous cell carcinoma. The challenge that we encountered was to determine its origin, the possibilities being divergent differentiation from adenocarcinoma post radiation therapy, de novo neoplasm or urothelial carcinoma with extensive squamous differentiation. Our literature review showed also that the etiology of prostatic squamous carcinoma is still unclear. We present our approach in an attempt to solve this dilemma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 36%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Other 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 43%
Unspecified 10 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%