↓ Skip to main content

Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
82 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069924
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Timothy J. White, Bojian Zhong, David Penny

Abstract

We demonstrate quantitatively that, as predicted by evolutionary theory, sequences of homologous proteins from different species converge as we go further and further back in time. The converse, a non-evolutionary model can be expressed as probabilities, and the test works for chloroplast, nuclear and mitochondrial sequences, as well as for sequences that diverged at different time depths. Even on our conservative test, the probability that chance could produce the observed levels of ancestral convergence for just one of the eight datasets of 51 proteins is ≈1×10⁻¹⁹ and combined over 8 datasets is ≈1×10⁻¹³². By comparison, there are about 10⁸⁰ protons in the universe, hence the probability that the sequences could have been produced by a process involving unrelated ancestral sequences is about 10⁵⁰ lower than picking, among all protons, the same proton at random twice in a row. A non-evolutionary control model shows no convergence, and only a small number of parameters are required to account for the observations. It is time that that researchers insisted that doubters put up testable alternatives to evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 9%
United States 2 4%
Belize 1 2%
Colombia 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 37 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#500,999
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,906
of 225,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,624
of 209,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#177
of 4,844 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,844 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.