You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A narrative approach to explore grief experiences and treatment adherence in people with chronic pain after participation in a pain-management program: a 6-year follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s46272 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elin Dysvik, Gerd Natvig, Bodil Furnes |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to explore grief caused by chronic pain and treatment adherence, and how these experiences are integrated into ongoing life stories. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#954
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,539
of 198,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#20
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.