↓ Skip to main content

Implicit Memory in Music and Language

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implicit Memory in Music and Language
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Ettlinger, Elizabeth H. Margulis, Patrick C. M. Wong

Abstract

Research on music and language in recent decades has focused on their overlapping neurophysiological, perceptual, and cognitive underpinnings, ranging from the mechanism for encoding basic auditory cues to the mechanism for detecting violations in phrase structure. These overlaps have most often been identified in musicians with musical knowledge that was acquired explicitly, through formal training. In this paper, we review independent bodies of work in music and language that suggest an important role for implicitly acquired knowledge, implicit memory, and their associated neural structures in the acquisition of linguistic or musical grammar. These findings motivate potential new work that examines music and language comparatively in the context of the implicit memory system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Norway 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
France 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 181 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 16%
Researcher 24 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 29%
Arts and Humanities 28 14%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Linguistics 13 7%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,083,708
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,273
of 34,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,994
of 192,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#30
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.