↓ Skip to main content

Automatic Round-the-Clock Detection of Whales for Mitigation from Underwater Noise Impacts

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automatic Round-the-Clock Detection of Whales for Mitigation from Underwater Noise Impacts
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel P. Zitterbart, Lars Kindermann, Elke Burkhardt, Olaf Boebel

Abstract

Loud hydroacoustic sources, such as naval mid-frequency sonars or airguns for marine geophysical prospecting, have been increasingly criticized for their possible negative effects on marine mammals and were implicated in several whale stranding events. Competent authorities now regularly request the implementation of mitigation measures, including the shut-down of acoustic sources when marine mammals are sighted within a predefined exclusion zone. Commonly, ship-based marine mammal observers (MMOs) are employed to visually monitor this zone. This approach is personnel-intensive and not applicable during night time, even though most hydroacoustic activities run day and night. This study describes and evaluates an automatic, ship-based, thermographic whale detection system that continuously scans the ship's environs for whale blows. Its performance is independent of daylight and exhibits an almost uniform, omnidirectional detection probability within a radius of 5 km. It outperforms alerted observers in terms of number of detected blows and ship-whale encounters. Our results demonstrate that thermal imaging can be used for reliable and continuous marine mammal protection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Argentina 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
French Guiana 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 168 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Other 23 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 45%
Environmental Science 41 23%
Engineering 8 4%
Physics and Astronomy 5 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 28 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#579,101
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,869
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,283
of 210,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#197
of 4,764 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,764 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.