You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variability of Intensive Care Admission Decisions for the Very Elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0034387 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariane Boumendil, Derek C. Angus, Anne-Laure Guitonneau, Anne-Marie Menn, Christine Ginsburg, Khalil Takun, Alain Davido, Rafik Masmoudi, Benoît Doumenc, Dominique Pateron, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Dominique Somme, Tabassome Simon, Philippe Aegerter, Bertrand Guidet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,389,235
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#144,676
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,399
of 177,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,158
of 3,789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.