↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007088.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Michele Rossi, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 36 27%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 26 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,070,243
of 14,998,885 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,780
of 11,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,143
of 158,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,998,885 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.