↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007088.pub2
Pubmed ID
23939652
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Michele Rossi, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

The management of people at high risk of perioperative death due to their general condition (high-risk surgical patients) with acute calculous cholecystitis is controversial, with no clear guidelines. In particular, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy in these patients has not been defined.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Master 25 13%
Other 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 55 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,351,041
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,168
of 12,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,854
of 198,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.