↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive‐behavioural treatment for subacute and chronic neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive‐behavioural treatment for subacute and chronic neck pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010664
Authors

Marco Monticone, Christine Cedraschi, Barbara Rocca, Roberta Fiorentini, Maddalena Restelli, Silvia E Gianola, Simona Ferrante, Gustavo Zanoli, Lorenzo Moja, Monticone, Marco, Cedraschi, Christine, Rocca, Barbara, Fiorentini, Roberta, Restelli, Maddalena, Gianola, Silvia E, Ferrante, Simona, Zanoli, Gustavo, Moja, Lorenzo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Psychology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 9 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#2,916,937
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,399
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,178
of 144,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.