↓ Skip to main content

Automated identification of pneumonia in chest radiograph reports in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated identification of pneumonia in chest radiograph reports in critically ill patients
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Liu, Mark P Clark, Mark Mendoza, Ramin Saket, Marla N Gardner, Benjamin J Turk, Gabriel J Escobar

Abstract

Prior studies demonstrate the suitability of natural language processing (NLP) for identifying pneumonia in chest radiograph (CXR) reports, however, few evaluate this approach in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 63 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 37%
Computer Science 12 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,926,577
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#238
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,253
of 196,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.