↓ Skip to main content

Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science?

Overview of attention for article published in Food Webs, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 109)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science?
Published in
Food Webs, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.008
Authors

Benjamin L. Allen, Lee R. Allen, Henrik Andrén, Guy Ballard, Luigi Boitani, Richard M. Engeman, Peter J.S. Fleming, Adam T. Ford, Peter M. Haswell, Rafał Kowalczyk, John D.C. Linnell, L. David Mech, Daniel M. Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 212 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Researcher 44 21%
Student > Master 42 20%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 11 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 49%
Environmental Science 57 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 32 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#616,965
of 15,947,544 outputs
Outputs from Food Webs
#7
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,500
of 262,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Webs
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,947,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them