You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Food Webs, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.008 |
Authors |
Benjamin L. Allen, Lee R. Allen, Henrik Andrén, Guy Ballard, Luigi Boitani, Richard M. Engeman, Peter J.S. Fleming, Adam T. Ford, Peter M. Haswell, Rafał Kowalczyk, John D.C. Linnell, L. David Mech, Daniel M. Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 9 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
Iceland | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Bhutan | 1 | 3% |
Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
Scientists | 15 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 288 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 20% |
Student > Master | 50 | 17% |
Researcher | 49 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Other | 37 | 13% |
Unknown | 56 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 45% |
Environmental Science | 63 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 4% |
Unknown | 65 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,182,783
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Food Webs
#19
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,514
of 324,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Webs
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.