↓ Skip to main content

Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science?

Overview of attention for article published in Food Webs, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 165)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can we save large carnivores without losing large carnivore science?
Published in
Food Webs, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.02.008
Authors

Benjamin L. Allen, Lee R. Allen, Henrik Andrén, Guy Ballard, Luigi Boitani, Richard M. Engeman, Peter J.S. Fleming, Adam T. Ford, Peter M. Haswell, Rafał Kowalczyk, John D.C. Linnell, L. David Mech, Daniel M. Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 262 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 21%
Student > Master 50 19%
Researcher 48 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 46%
Environmental Science 61 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 53 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,001,238
of 22,087,588 outputs
Outputs from Food Webs
#12
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,484
of 277,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Webs
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,087,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them