↓ Skip to main content

Psychological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004858.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy Kenworthy, Clive E Adams, Charlotte Bilby, Belinda Brooks-Gordon, Mark Fenton

Abstract

Sexual offending is both a social problem and a public health issue. To date, no positive treatment effects have been found in quasi-experimental institutional treatment programmes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 6%
United States 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Psychology 8 22%
Social Sciences 6 17%
Computer Science 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,019,186
of 13,728,230 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,889
of 10,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,925
of 158,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,728,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.