↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
Published in
BMJ Open, August 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Mc Hugh, Monica O'Mullane, Ivan J Perry, Colin Bradley

Abstract

To examine the barriers to, and facilitators in, improving diabetes management from the general practice perspective, in advance of the implementation of an integrated model of care in Ireland.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2013.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#15,094
of 25,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,516
of 209,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#163
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.