↓ Skip to main content

T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005641.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

T-tube drainage may prevent bile leak from the biliary tract following bile duct exploration and it offers post-operative access to the bile ducts for visualisation and exploration. Use of T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration is controversial.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,860,094
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,863
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,812
of 154,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.