You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and correlates of current daily use of electronic cigarettes in the European Union: analysis of the 2014 Eurobarometer survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Internal and Emergency Medicine, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11739-017-1643-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantinos E. Farsalinos, Konstantinos Poulas, Vassilis Voudris, Jacques Le Houezec |
| Abstract |
The study purpose was to analyze current daily and current daily nicotine-containing electronic cigarette (EC) use in the European Union (EU). Special Eurobarometer 429, a cross-sectional survey performed in a representative sample of 28 member states of the EU in November and December of 2014, was analyzed. The prevalence of current daily and current daily nicotine-containing EC use was 1.08% (95% CI 0.95-1.20%) and 1.00% (95% CI 0.88-1.12%), respectively, and was mainly observed in current and former smokers. Minimal current daily (0.08%, 95% CI 0.03-0.12%) and current daily nicotine-containing EC use (0.04%, 95% CI 0.01-0.08%) was observed among never smokers. Smoking cessation with the help of ECs was reported by 47.12% (95% CI 41.28-52.96%) of current daily and 49.14% (95% CI 43.12-55.17%) of current daily nicotine-containing EC users. Additionally, 33.18% (95% CI 27.67-38.69%) and 31.40% (95% CI 25.80-36.99%) reported reduction in smoking consumption, respectively. The strongest correlates of daily EC use were being current and former smokers. In the EU in late 2014, current daily EC use was predominantly observed in current and former smokers and was associated with high self-reported rates of smoking cessation and reduction. Current daily EC use by never smokers was extremely infrequent. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 6% |
| Greece | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2022.
All research outputs
#969,239
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#46
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,586
of 324,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.