You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-98 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rochelle M Eime, Janet A Young, Jack T Harvey, Melanie J Charity, Warren R Payne |
| Abstract |
There are specific guidelines regarding the level of physical activity (PA) required to provide health benefits. However, the research underpinning these PA guidelines does not address the element of social health. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence about the levels or types of PA associated specifically with psychological health. This paper first presents the results of a systematic review of the psychological and social health benefits of participation in sport by children and adolescents. Secondly, the information arising from the systematic review has been used to develop a conceptual model. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 17% |
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 10% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 75% |
| Scientists | 11 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,899 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1880 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 337 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 252 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 185 | 10% |
| Researcher | 142 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 97 | 5% |
| Other | 273 | 14% |
| Unknown | 613 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 375 | 20% |
| Psychology | 211 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 146 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 128 | 7% |
| Other | 192 | 10% |
| Unknown | 673 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 411. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#73,374
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#19
of 2,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#428
of 208,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.