↓ Skip to main content

Smoking cessation interventions for smokers with current or past depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Smoking cessation interventions for smokers with current or past depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006102.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina M van der Meer, Marc C Willemsen, Filip Smit, Pim Cuijpers

Abstract

Individuals with current or past depression are often smokers who are more nicotine dependent, more likely to suffer from negative mood changes after nicotine withdrawal, and more likely to relapse to smoking after quitting than the general population, which contributes to their higher morbidity and mortality from smoking-related illnesses. It remains unclear what interventions can help them to quit smoking.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 214 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 20%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Unspecified 27 12%
Other 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 31%
Psychology 58 27%
Unspecified 37 17%
Social Sciences 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Other 24 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#554,193
of 13,503,657 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,729
of 10,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,818
of 158,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,503,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.