↓ Skip to main content

Heparin for assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heparin for assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009452.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad A Akhtar, Shyamaly D Sur, Nick Raine-Fenning, Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan, Jim G Thornton, Siobhan Quenby

Abstract

Heparin as an adjunct in assisted reproduction (peri-implantation heparin) is given at or after egg collection or at embryo transfer during assisted reproduction. Heparin has been advocated to improve embryo implantation and clinical outcomes.  It has been proposed that heparin enhances the intra-uterine environment by improving decidualisation with an associated activation of growth factors and a cytokine expression profile in the endometrium that is favourable to pregnancy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Professor 6 5%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 39%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 31 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,177,155
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,552
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,149
of 154,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.