↓ Skip to main content

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (a traditional Chinese medicine) for primary nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (a traditional Chinese medicine) for primary nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008568.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yizhi Chen, Zhixiang Gong, Xiangmei Chen, Li Tang, Xuezhi Zhao, Qing Yuan, Guangyan Cai

Abstract

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicine used as an immunosuppressive agent, has been prescribed in China for patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (NS) for more than two decades. Although patients with primary NS in China have benefited from TwHF treatment, its properties have not yet been fully understood.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Unspecified 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 55%
Unspecified 10 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2013.
All research outputs
#10,024,025
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,547
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,834
of 154,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.