↓ Skip to main content

Network-Level Structural Abnormalities of Cerebral Cortex in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network-Level Structural Abnormalities of Cerebral Cortex in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071304
Pubmed ID
Authors

In Kyoon Lyoo, Sujung Yoon, Perry F. Renshaw, Jaeuk Hwang, Sujin Bae, Gail Musen, Jieun E. Kim, Nicolas Bolo, Hyeonseok S. Jeong, Donald C. Simonson, Sun Hea Lee, Katie Weinger, Jiyoung J. Jung, Christopher M. Ryan, Yera Choi, Alan M. Jacobson

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) usually begins in childhood and adolescence and causes lifelong damage to several major organs including the brain. Despite increasing evidence of T1DM-induced structural deficits in cortical regions implicated in higher cognitive and emotional functions, little is known whether and how the structural connectivity between these regions is altered in the T1DM brain. Using inter-regional covariance of cortical thickness measurements from high-resolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance data, we examined the topological organizations of cortical structural networks in 81 T1DM patients and 38 healthy subjects. We found a relative absence of hierarchically high-level hubs in the prefrontal lobe of T1DM patients, which suggests ineffective top-down control of the prefrontal cortex in T1DM. Furthermore, inter-network connections between the strategic/executive control system and systems subserving other cortical functions including language and mnemonic/emotional processing were also less integrated in T1DM patients than in healthy individuals. The current results provide structural evidence for T1DM-related dysfunctional cortical organization, which specifically underlie the top-down cognitive control of language, memory, and emotion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#19,020,456
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#162,042
of 201,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,404
of 200,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,558
of 4,735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.