↓ Skip to main content

How do health workers perceive and practice monitoring and evaluation of malaria control interventions in South-east Nigeria?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do health workers perceive and practice monitoring and evaluation of malaria control interventions in South-east Nigeria?
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chinyere O Mbachu, Benjamin SC Uzochukwu, Obinna E Onwujekwe, Amobi L Ilika, Joseph Oranuba

Abstract

The Anambra state Malaria Control Booster Project (ANMCBP) depends on an effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to continuously improve the implementation of the malaria control interventions. However, it is not clear how the health workers that are expected to be the fulcrum of the malaria M&E perceive and practise M&E. The study was carried out to determine the knowledge, perception, and practice of Malaria M&E among selected health staff, and to identify related socio-demographic factors, including cadre of staff.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 30%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 37%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,343,746
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,444
of 7,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,388
of 194,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#82
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.