You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fungi of the Murine Gut: Episodic Variation and Proliferation during Antibiotic Treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0071806 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Serena Dollive, Ying-Yu Chen, Stephanie Grunberg, Kyle Bittinger, Christian Hoffmann, Lee Vandivier, Christopher Cuff, James D. Lewis, Gary D. Wu, Frederic D. Bushman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 24% |
| Researcher | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,538,491
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#104,947
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,256
of 213,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,712
of 4,735 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,735 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.