↓ Skip to main content

GABA promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines by controlling local Ca2+ signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
422 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GABA promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines by controlling local Ca2+ signaling
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/nn.3496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatsuya Hayama, Jun Noguchi, Satoshi Watanabe, Noriko Takahashi, Akiko Hayashi-Takagi, Graham C R Ellis-Davies, Masanori Matsuzaki, Haruo Kasai

Abstract

Activity-dependent competition of synapses plays a key role in neural organization and is often promoted by GABA; however, its cellular bases are poorly understood. Excitatory synapses of cortical pyramidal neurons are formed on small protrusions known as dendritic spines, which exhibit structural plasticity. We used two-color uncaging of glutamate and GABA in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons and found that spine shrinkage and elimination were markedly promoted by the activation of GABAA receptors shortly before action potentials. GABAergic inhibition suppressed bulk increases in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentrations, whereas it preserved the Ca(2+) nanodomains generated by NMDA-type receptors, both of which were necessary for spine shrinkage. Unlike spine enlargement, spine shrinkage spread to neighboring spines (<15 μm) and competed with their enlargement, and this process involved the actin-depolymerizing factor ADF/cofilin. Thus, GABAergic inhibition directly suppresses local dendritic Ca(2+) transients and strongly promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Japan 7 2%
Germany 6 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 388 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 30%
Researcher 104 25%
Student > Master 39 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 40 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 180 43%
Neuroscience 125 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 44 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,469,267
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,084
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,023
of 215,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#46
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.