You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What’s so special about empirical adequacy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13194-017-0171-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam, Nancy Cartwright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 8 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,543,199
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#151
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,022
of 307,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them