You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Geospatial Modelling Approach Integrating Archaeobotany and Genetics to Trace the Origin and Dispersal of Domesticated Plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob van Etten, Robert J. Hijmans |
| Abstract |
The study of the prehistoric origins and dispersal routes of domesticated plants is often based on the analysis of either archaeobotanical or genetic data. As more data become available, spatially explicit models of crop dispersal can be used to combine different types of evidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 170 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Professor | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 13 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,331,272
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#87,411
of 193,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,458
of 94,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#421
of 776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.