↓ Skip to main content

Mutation c.943G>T (p.Ala315Ser) in FGFR2 Causing a Mild Phenotype of Crouzon Craniofacial Dysostosis in a Three-Generation Family

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Syndromology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 244)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mutation c.943G>T (p.Ala315Ser) in FGFR2 Causing a Mild Phenotype of Crouzon Craniofacial Dysostosis in a Three-Generation Family
Published in
Molecular Syndromology, January 2017
DOI 10.1159/000455028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luitgard M. Graul-Neumann, Eva Klopocki, Nicolai Adolphs, Martin A. Mensah, Wolfram Kress

Abstract

Crouzon syndrome craniofacial dysostosis type I [OMIM 123500] is caused by mutations in the gene encoding fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2). An overlapping phenotype with Muenke and Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans (FGFR3 mutations) is known. The clinical diagnosis can be corroborated by molecular studies in about 80-90% of the cases. No clear genotype/phenotype correlation has been identified yet. Here, we describe a second family with a mild phenotype in which the FGFR2 mutation c.943G>T leading to the amino acid substitution p.Ala315Ser was detected. Five affected family members showed craniofacial dysostosis without overt craniosynostosis. They all had midface hypoplasia. Crouzonoid appearance with mild protrusion of bulbi was only apparent in our index patient as well as obstructive sleep apnea episodes leading to reduced oxygen saturation; therefore, surgical intervention was suggested. One other affected family member additionally had iris coloboma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,209,296
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Syndromology
#37
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,628
of 421,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Syndromology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.